BR Reader v5-sitewide|Open original|Lite view
Comments for page "Entity 67 - "Partygoers =)"" https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers Posts in the discussion thread "Entity 67 - "Partygoers =)"" Sat, 11 Jul 2026 17:53:11 +0000 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-7193646 yo https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-7193646 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:27:32 +0000 Autist#67 8805284 Mr kebab is a kebab now

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6810485 Re: 2:00 am binge-read session https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6810485 Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:11:23 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 centurys lute,

Our friend and colleague to the rescue. Thank you so much for the +1.

By the time that "Fun War - Turning Point" makes its appearance, Partygoers will be a bit more loved and Respected.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6810318 2:00 am binge-read session https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6810318 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 19:26:12 +0000 centurys lute 8580783 a fascinating take on an early concept.

+1

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6660820 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6660820 Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:58 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 Very late update. This was fixed.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6538360 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6538360 Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:48:11 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 For anyone wondering, The Concord Entity Classification System is broken at the top of the page, and on tons of other pages atm. Staff is working to fix it.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6507702 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6507702 Fri, 10 May 2024 00:24:30 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 ImBadAtUsernames,

Please forgive my delay in responding! Although I am retired (age 72) , I am still an active author, photographer, and media consultant. I only just now got around to checking comments on my pages. Thank you for your very kind words. I am very excited to inform you that Level Fun is going through the Greenlight process as I write this. You will LOVE where this "party" is heading…

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6501303 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6501303 Sat, 04 May 2024 05:14:30 +0000 ImBadAtUsernames 8374105 Now THIS is a good rewrite, the original partygoers article was bland and a product of this time, and this is a complete overhaul that still keeps the original idea intact, while bringing it up to modern quality standards.

+1 =)

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6472380 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6472380 Fri, 05 Apr 2024 01:01:57 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 PREPARE2MEETYOURSELF,

Please forgive my terrible delay in replying to your kindness. Currently balancing Backrooms fiction, paranormal investigation and research, and professional photography. Good thing that I am retired!

Let's hope that you enjoy Level Fun when my grandson, Cody, and I finish that project.

Until the next, my friend and colleague, take care and live large.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6465408 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6465408 Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:55:23 +0000 PREPARE2MEETYOURSELF 7361684 good rewrite that can stand on its own with or without prior knowledge, also ditches the format screw of the original article for a more well-composed, formulaic read that doesn't need any gimmicks or shock factor to hook you in

I loved the description of their silly biology and the food. mmm, almost makes me want to eat some partygoer snacks

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6456065 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6456065 Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:44:59 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 CriminalOfLiminal,

Indeed, my friend, they HAVE returned! Love them or hate them, they are back!

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6455593 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6455593 Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:58:20 +0000 CriminalOfLiminal 8790543 They have returned

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6447168 Re: OH GOD THEY ARE BACK AND BETTER https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6447168 Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:23:13 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 The BackRooms Roamer

Today is my birthday and I turn 72 and wake up to this. THANK YOU! for your kindness and support! What a wonderful present!

To answer your questions, sort of. Our next projects are Level Fun and Party Hosts. The Partygoers story is evolving. Other writers are currently working on their versions of the fun war and "Partypoopers." Ideas for related tales are dancing in my brain. Hard to say, right at this moment.

My grandson, Cody, and I, are humbled by your words.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6445362 OH GOD THEY ARE BACK AND BETTER https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6445362 Sat, 02 Mar 2024 22:02:07 +0000 The BackRooms Roamer 8001517 I am not really surprised its this good. I mean, the Partygoer Zero page already teased the new story and concept of the partygoers, without removing the characteristics of our good old yellow leather skinned psycopathic bags!
Now, nostalgia aside, your work was incredible, and I can't wait for your next project!
Tho, I do have some questions;
1, Do you pretend on working on other important details of the original partygoers? For Example the fun war.
2, Will there be more information regarding the origins of the Partygoers? We know Partygoer Zero was the first "infected", but do you pretend on expanding on this concept?
3, Is there any plans on making a canon/more related content to this entity?
Overall incredible rewrite!
=)

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443317 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443317 Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:18:28 +0000 Agent Skyes 6304563 I'm not contradicting myself, I was saying it's a jarring contrast to have informal writing on a serious subject.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443184 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443184 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:45:39 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Agent Skyes

THANK YOU! for this.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443161 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443161 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:15:13 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 Well I'm glad you enjoyed it! This is pretty new, and Level Fun is next!

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443160 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443160 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:12:38 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 What exactly is it about this execution that you dislike? The narrative? The new concept? Writing style? Something else?

Negative bias from the old partygoers will inevitably carry over, but there should be no bias when making a vote. It should only pertain to the content of this page in its current iteration, and nothing else. I'm not necessarily saying this because of you, but I believe that much of the hate towards the page is due to the original entity we decided to rewrite, and less about the quality of our writing/our version of them (minus a few critics who focus solely on that writing, which is fine. We can't please everyone). If there is genuine criticism about the page, I'd like to hear it, so that we can see if there is any way in which we can improve it given our vision for the entity and its lore.

This new version is definitely not quite mascot horror. It's a bit different from that, despite not having changed their appearance. It's now leaning more towards a body horror direction. I hope the sole reason people downvoted it was not because we did not change its appearance, Pretty much everything else about it has changed, including the why's and how's of how it exists, as well as it's behaviors and internal anatomy. It may look the same, but it's a very different entity to how it was before.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443154 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443154 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:53:04 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 Thank you! A lot of people have the misconception that the M.E.G. is a super professional group very similar to SCP, when they have completely different goals, founders, people, environments, situations, motives, and more. It's only natural that it would develop differently. As the current owner of the M.E.G., I intend to rewrite the database to be more like that "travel handbook" interpretation, and to separate the group from any views of SCP. They take priority in warning people of dangers and give them as much vital information as they can to help wanderers to prepare should they travel or encounter the things in the database. That doesn't mean they can't have more detailed descriptions of things, nor that they can't use clinical tone in articles. As I've said before, it can all depend on the people who document these things, and the people writing the entries in-lore. This will also allow authors to play with more themes, tones, and writing styles from an out-of-universe perspective, without needing to use a different canon, nor to have inconsistency in the lore.

The M.E.G. was created with one goal: to find an exit back to the Frontrooms. Over time without success, they've focused on helping wanderers and protecting them from danger. The theme of the group overall is hope, to keep going in the darkest of times.

The one thing that always drove me crazy was the M.E.G. Edgy theme, which was designed to hide classified information. The group wouldn't do that given that they exist to help wanderers and inform them, the literal opposite of SCP. Now, if there's some kind of cognito-hazard or other dangers that become a problem if people know about them, that'd be an exception, but those are pretty rare. It's what the Omega level classification is for. As for super clinical articles, those I'd say depend completely on if you have a professional writing said articles in-lore. There are definitely doctors, psychologists, physicists, and many other former professionals helping the group by this point. But even if they write an article, it needs to be simplified enough that the average person can understand it. Writing in a scientific journal level of detail would make things messy with the higher ups, who won't understand that stuff when reading them.

I hope to soon convey this M.E.G. interpretation to the general TS community.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443116 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443116 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:07:17 +0000 Anime_Roar 8294543

despite the very serious subject matter.

So you're basically contradicting yourself?

Also, I'm pretty sure other serious articles would use the word "nightmare" or "horrific" or whatever lol, they're literally just describing them.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6443014 Re: https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6443014 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:16:22 +0000 Agent Skyes 6304563 Thank you and your grandson for replying to my comment.

As we can all agree, emotional prose is usually much more effective at holding the reader's interest than netural, clinical statements. That's why good SCP articles, which are written in a clinical tone, usually have a little prose in them to create an interesting narrative (e.g. When Day Breaks, SCP-5000, etc.) Additionally, as MC_Crafter_24_7 said, "the M.E.G. is not a group that prides itself on professionalism." This made me think, and I realized that the M.E.G. database is much different than the SCP database. While the SCP database consists of instructions for procedures to be carried out by professionals, it seems to me that M.E.G. database is more of a travel handbook for the Backrooms. Supporting this interpretation, the Yellowstone National Park's digital guide has an entry for cougars that reads in part,

This is a real description created on a professional (as in not amatuer) website that is intended to educate visitors on the nature of cougars and give them the information the visitors need to protect themselves. However, it is not written in a super clinical tone, e.g. "few people ever see them", "prime habitat for cougars." Given this example, perhaps there is no need for the M.E.G. to use a very clinical tone like SCP. Thank you for helping me reevaluate my position on the use of tone in these articles. I'm going to change my downvote to an upvote. ]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442988 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442988 Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:51:46 +0000 Agent Skyes 6304563 If you were writing a super-serious document, which i'm not saying it is, then you wouldn't use the word nightmare or ask rhetorical questions and say things are horrific. However, those words and phrases are good at conveying emotion, which makes them effective rhetoric.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442549 Re: Cautious +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442549 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 23:31:06 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 We moved the habitats section to after description and behaviors to hopefully make it a bit better

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442545 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442545 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 23:25:02 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 We both wrote it. It's a collab

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442424 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442424 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:50:44 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 Third-person, clinical writing does not convey emotion that well, and quite frankly, a lot of people, including me would likely find that would be a lot of wasted potential with this. This page is written to maximize the impact, and there's no better way to do this other than to bring it down to a more human level, as opposed to an emotionless narration of sorts. Quite simply, we prefer a less clinical writing style with more emphasis on the characters' first person experiences and feelings. Robert usually sprinkles his articles with this, even if they have more factual, third-person writing than not. We make sure to focus on entertainment above all else. As that's what stories and fictional universes like this aim to achieve. They fascinate the reader, or bring some other emotional impact, such as a feeling of dread.

This article tells a story, as we chose to make partygoer lore more narratively-driven. This wiki is going more in a story-telling direction, which is what brought me here in the first place. I love fascinating stories and lore, so I'll be doing a variety of writing styles on different pages to reflect the different situations and writers of the actual entries in-lore. It adds character, not to mention, the M.E.G. is not a group that prides itself on professionalism. It focuses on getting the job done. (It was founded by three teenagers for crying out loud). Not all entries will be written in the same way.

Critiques of the perspective (first-person, third-person, etc.) of the writing are far more subjective, unless ofc there is inconsistency within writing/dialogue by the same character.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442348 (no title) https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442348 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:35:32 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Agent Skyes,

Thank you so very much for commenting. The Entity 67 page takes place not long after the M.E.G. learns that Partygoers are truly undead entities and not just cannibalistic wanderers in disguise. (In defense of this scenario, after five decades of investigating the paranormal across many jurisdictions and several states for over five decades in real life, I have met more than my share of local law enforcement that fit this exact profile.) The M.E.G. is in shock as this is the first time these particular human transformations are officially observed. At a loss for information, some officials turn to the hacked Partygoer websites for information. Others think that trusting Partygoer data is a mistake.

"The rumors are true! Partygoers can turn people into them! Three of us made it out unscathed. We had to kill six of our own before they transformed completely." Emotions are running high! The comments in this initial report are darker when taken in context.

The situation is chaos and confusion reigns.

The bottom line is that Partygoers (at one time human) and the M.E.G. are "evaluating" each other. Misinformation is everywhere. We see both sides making mistakes. One group seeks survival; the other seeks supremacy.

Yes, this was a collaboration, and I am proud of the contributions made by my grandson. I believe that I wrote at least two, maybe all three, of the comments that you find silly. This is not a rebuttal. If we had to rewrite this, it would probably read the same. (This is our vision of Partygoers.) Glad that you enjoyed my other works. Level Fun is up next.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442295 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442295 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:23:21 +0000 LinkandDrizt 9015754 He's right. Those last two are not silly. They are just different. Also, this article was written by Goerman's grandson. He's mentioned that repeatedly.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442291 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442291 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:16:07 +0000 Anime_Roar 8294543 I don't see how the last two are informal and "silly" but ok

Also, people can change their writing styles for once lmao

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6442222 -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6442222 Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:43:36 +0000 Agent Skyes 6304563 Before I get into my criticism, I'll start with the positives. This article seems very well-structured and is a good length without being too long. This article uses many different formats of documents (images, testimonies, interviews, messages, etc.) in a skilled way.

Aside from that, what really irked me about this piece was the writing style itself. It seems to be informal and silly, despite the very serious subject matter. I find this strange, because I've enjoyed several articles written by Mr. Goerman in the past (such as Level 345, Phenomenon 7, and Entity 123). I'm not sure if this writing style was done on purpose, to reflect on the "party" theme, but it doesn't sit well with me. Here's a few examples I found irksome:

The rumors are true! Partygoers can turn people into them!

These tall, bipedal nightmares have smooth, leathery skin.

There is disagreement among M.E.G. officials as to the accuracy of the data found within the hacked Partygoer websites. Is it factual? Is it exaggerated? Can it be nothing more than fabricated disinformation? In any event, it is horrific.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6441373 Re: -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6441373 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:22:37 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Vaixen,

THANK YOU! ever so much for reading, voting, and commenting.

My grandson Cody and I began our rewrite of Partygoers knowing three (3) things:

  1. Some readers hate Partygoers and are happy they are gone.
  2. Other readers tolerate Partygoers, but wish the narrative was more to their liking.
  3. Many readers love Partygoers and celebrate their return.

Our combined mission was to rewrite Partygoers in a manner that was respectful to their original creator. My personal mission was to bring the undead to the Backrooms. Creatures that were once human, and through no fault of their own, became "monsters."

We returned Partygoers in a "new/old" way. The votes fell pretty much where I expected them.

Here's hoping that you might enjoy Level "SS Fun" and "Party Hosts."

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6441244 Re: Not quite. -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6441244 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:17:44 +0000 Sariastuff 6864497 Yes, I realise, it's called in-depth critique that goes beyond just saying 'this article is good' or 'this article is bad'. Generally people learn the most from in-depth critique.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6441196 -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6441196 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:08:01 +0000 Vaixen 7430610 I have never been a huge fan of the Partygoers, their concept as a whole has always exuded the classic, saturated mascot horror tone that I very-much despise. Sadly, this new execution does not do much for me either.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6440548 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6440548 Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:18:34 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 AFriendlyPotato,

Please tell your friends that the Partygoers have returned. Now everyone can once again write and enjoy articles about them here on this Wiki. Level Fun and Party Hosts are next.

THANK YOU! for your +1.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6440039 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6440039 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 23:28:31 +0000 AFriendlyPotato 9017530 Honestly I didn't even know this page was made so recently I thought it existed on here for a while lol

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6440000 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6440000 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:26:19 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Yoink_Fricc06,

THANK YOU! for your welcoming kindness and support.

In the lore developed by Cody (my grandson) and myself, Partygoers are more than just another "murder monster." Oh, they are monsters. And… they do murder. But these monsters were once human. More than anything else, Partygoers represents human tragedy. Be that as it may, we invite our friends and colleagues here to have their own ideas of fun =) with Partygoers. The boys in yellow are back. Enjoy!

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439930 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439930 Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:57:48 +0000 Yoink_Fricc06 8537682 Goerman knocks it out of the park per usual with this one. I don't think there was a better author for the job when it comes to rewritting such an important piece of backrooms history and lore. I hope moving forward people don't see these guys cringe anymore and I really think this article is gonna help that to be the case.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439229 Re: Not quite. -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439229 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:54:23 +0000 UltimateSword 8759117 Instead of writing this you could write a whole article, you realize how long this comment is?

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439222 Re: Tweaks! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439222 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:26:54 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 THANK YOU! You know, we saw the Partygoers very clearly in our minds. We just forgot to tell the rest of you what we saw. Please understand how much =) this was to collaborate with my grandson. I love him to pieces. This will be a memory for him long after I am gone. We really want our vision to add to the legend and lore of the Backrooms.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439220 Re: Tweaks! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439220 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:17:08 +0000 Error012 8765439 Good modifications, I really think they were good ideas.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439187 Tweaks! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439187 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 22:04:33 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 We tweaked the "Biology (Updated)" section to include observations by our readers… And changed the order of other sections… Maybe we got too excited and too close to the article… Not seeing the forest for the trees. Even happens to experienced authors. You folks are great!

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439071 Re: WOOHOO!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439071 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:54:51 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 You are so kind that a solitary tear of happiness rolled down this old man's cheek.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439070 Re: WOOHOO!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439070 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:53:33 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 How famous infamous do you want us to be?

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439069 Re: New Tale https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439069 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:49:49 +0000 LinkandDrizt 9015754 =)

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439066 Re: New Tale https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439066 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:44:32 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 LinkandDrizt,

Get some critique and join the = )

Loving it!

Just be sure your character feels a little seasick. LOL.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439065 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439065 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:38:16 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 feot,

Every +1 is like Christmas morning for us!

THANK YOU! very much to the reader for supporting our vision.

We will do our best to keep these undead Partygoers alive! LOL.

Level "The SS Fun" is next, bringing back Level Fun.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6439061 Re: OH MY GODNESS!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6439061 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:33:45 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Afulai2333,

OH MY GODNESS indeed!!!

The Partygoers are back. We have tightened this page a wee bit.

THANK YOU! for supporting our vision. We mean that… VERY MUCH.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438885 New Tale https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438885 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:53:27 +0000 LinkandDrizt 9015754 I have so many projects going on, but…

Here is an old abandoned tale I was writing for DuskNeoka, but since he left…

Anyway, @Goerman and @MC_Crafter_24_7, here is my version of the Rediscovering of FUN. With some modifications, do you think it would work as a FUN tale?
FUN - Rediscovered

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438643 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438643 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:26:58 +0000 feot 8634911 The partygoers are back, thank you very much to the author

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438631 OH MY GODNESS!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438631 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:12:06 +0000 Afulai2333 8395268 PARTYGOERS RETURNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438240 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438240 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:23:25 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 ThatPartyGoer,

I knew that the whole love/hate thing was coming! I know there are folks unhappy with the return of Partygoers. I also know that some readers absolutely detest the direction that we decided to take. Maybe I am just getting senile.

THANK YOU! ever so much for your upvote =)

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438225 Re: Not quite. -1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438225 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:58:25 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Sariastuff,

This is why scientists will never analyze the DNA of angels. Let us, please, my dear friend and colleague, simply agree to disagree, and move on. With Partygoers rightfully returned to the Wiki, articles of every sort can now be written, by all manner of Backrooms authors, with or without mentioning Partygoer Zero or the insides of these abominations. Some folks seem to like the path I have chosen.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438222 Re: Cautious +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438222 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:40:40 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Unknown UIU agent,

I agree! The M.E.G. is in a state of confusion! THANK YOU! for supporting our vision. It might not (definitely) be perfect or the most popular, but it is our gift to the Backrooms Wiki community. Please enjoy and tell your friends…

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438147 Re: OMG!Party Guys are back! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438147 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:22:04 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Ambassador 404,

THANK YOU! for supporting our vision. It might not (definitely) be perfect or the most popular, but it is our gift to the Backrooms Wiki community. Let's all just have fun =) and write Partygoer stuff.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6438117 OMG!Party Guys are back! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6438117 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:41:26 +0000 CicadasinJune 8446398 Let’s get some fun,shall we?

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437967 Re: WOOHOO!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437967 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:59:51 +0000 LinkandDrizt 9015754 =)

Come Party with us. It's so fun! =)

Thank you for this, Robert Goerman and MC_Crafter. Thank you for bringing this back.

Also, we should ping Broogli to do a video on this.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437951 “Our Vision of Partygoers” https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437951 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:41:13 +0000 Robert Goerman 6447777 Greetings to our friends and colleagues,

Returning Partygoers to their rightful place in Backrooms Wiki lore is our gift to this wonderful community. Four interrelated pages (Partygoer Zero POI, Entity 67 – “Partygoers,” Level “SS Fun,” and Entity 167 – “The Party Hosts”) will represent the combined vision of Robert Goerman (me) and MC_Crafter_24_7 (Cody, my grandson).

Beyond Biology:
When Deacon Duncan no-clipped into that Phobic Centipede, the fusion went far beyond physical; it was also a merging of the consciousness or souls. Had Duncan no-clipped into a Hound or Wretch, a final death for all concerned would have been the outcome. The chimera resulting from this collision created an undead creature very much like the vampires of mythology. Vampires, although not living as we know it, “drink” blood to survive. Like the honeybee sips nectar and regurgitates it to make honey (bee food), Partygoers “eat” human tissue and regurgitate the substance to make “cake” (Partygoer food). Creatures like the fae and vampires of mythology do not consume items as living creatures normally do. They ingest the essence. There is an undead human body inside each Partygoer, modified with lamprey eels, and the anomalous Phobic Centipede. It can see and think and act.

Keeping an Original:
It is important for Cody and I to retain and respect the original creator’s vision. From the outside, Partygoers pretty much look and act the same. Authors should have little trouble adapting these abominations to any article written. If anything, we explain why 1000dumpling’s entities carve a smiley face (they need to see and the face is identical to the smile of a Phobic Centipede), and why some Partygoers have red balloons. The transformation process of human to Partygoer has not changed. Other writers are currently creating Backrooms features, based upon our vision.

Confusion:
The page for Entity 67 reflects the confusion when the Major Explorer Group realizes that their Team “Party Over” has been barking up the wrong tree. The M.E.G. is confronted with the fact that Partygoers are more than human cannibals in disguise satisfying their hunger. The steadfast narrow-mindedness of David Overbrook has dire consequences for his Team “Party Over,” and humanity in the Backrooms. (I have met many law enforcement officers in real life with this steadfast refusal to accept the paranormal, even when it is sitting before them.) The page shows the M.E.G. desperately shifting gears and changing direction. Every article foreshadows the next. I have been doing this since Level 365, my first article.

Irreconcilable Differences:
We realize that our vision of the origin and ethos of Partygoers is not for everyone. For me, in particular, the idea of a biological (infection, virus, mold, etcetera) pathogen responsible for the instant transformation from human to Partygoer made much less sense than a supernatural effect. It’s fun =) bringing the undead to the Backrooms! Suggestions did not fall on deaf ears. Let’s just say that we agree to disagree. This is not a rebuttal. You are all my friends and colleagues. It is hoped that more of you will support our vision than not. If nothing else, we have the approval of the original Partygoers creator. That means so very much to us. Thank you!

Updates:
We have created a post in the Lore section of the Forum to track Partygoer progress in the Backrooms.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437405 Re: Cautious +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437405 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:01:41 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 It is a constant struggle for the M.E.G. to document accurate information on these entities. Partygoers are more intelligent than humans, and they are plentiful. This page is in what's effectively a state of online tug-of-war with their edits and tampering. Not to mention, they spread rumors and false information offline and in other places, so the M.E.G. themselves are unsure whether their information is correct. The page's jumbled nature is reflective of this. Several people gave their input based on the way they interpreted what was real and false, and based on what they've seen. The only information that is certain to be true is what they themselves had witnessed.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437403 Re: +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437403 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:56:33 +0000 MC_Crafter_24_7 8055101 Or was it? =)

Jokes aside, there's definitely a lot of disinformation that makes it really hard for the M.E.G. to properly maintain this page.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437381 Cautious +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437381 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:56:36 +0000 Unknown UIU agent 4472915 The description and the narrative around the Partygoers and Team Partys over are great, but I personally feel like the pacing and position of each narrative part is extremely jumbled. Still, more than earns an upvote.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437283 Re: WOOHOO!!! https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437283 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:29:55 +0000 LinkandDrizt 9015754 Their back… and this time…

They're even deadlier.

This is an incredible rewrite, and it is well deserving of the title of True Backrooms, honestly.

]]>
https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523#post-6437108 +1 https://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16721523/entity-67-partygoers#post-6437108 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:42:08 +0000 ThatPartyGoer 7952340 This page was not made by a partygoer =) (+1)

]]>