I thought of Object C-bugdot-J
]]>Jokes aside, you’re allowed to expand on stuff I write! I have a few things I’m particular about preserving but this phenomenon you’re absolutely allowed to expand on in any direction you want.
]]>I have actually been impatiently waiting for this, to see where it would go.
Sounds like "Phenomenon 5 Meets Phenomenon 7."
Now I have to wait for the conclusion from RatifTheRatGod!
]]>GIRLY WHY'RE YOU OUT HERE CAUSING ME TO HAVE A LITERAL SPIT-TAKE
]]>i absolutely love the format of this page, super good :3
]]>Im not on acid I swear its just 2:30 am and my beainr no want sleppy
Uaeugh uhm +1 simple and to the point but not bland the ending is kind of cool but I wish there was a bit more so you had a direction for how you choose to interpret it
GL on the contest :)
]]>That doesn't make this a fun page to read. It's too simple and lacks any substance or development. Imo you're just plainly telling readers to care about the meaning of the article without showing them why. It doesn't encourage me to care about it.
Perhaps the meaning of the page goes over my head, but if I'm honest, it comes across as a little condescending in a "you're a plebian who doesn't get it" fashion. And I don't… the page just doesn't feel like it puts in enough effort to convince me that I should.
I'm open to changing my mind if you'd explain what's going on exactly :/
Hope it's not too harsh, just wanted to be honest!
]]>